AI and Driver Fatigue: Enhancing Officer Wellness and Safety

Introduction

Driving is one of the most common and essential tasks for police officers, but also one of the most challenging and risky. Police officers face various sources of stress, distraction, and fatigue while driving, which can impair their performance, well-being, and safety. According to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, traffic-related incidents are the second leading cause of officer fatalities, accounting for 27.2% of the total deaths in 2023[1].

DALL-E 3

Police officers are dedicated professionals who serve and protect their communities with courage and integrity. They face many challenges and risks in their daily work, including driver fatigue, which can impair their performance, judgment, and safety. Driver fatigue is a state of reduced alertness and concentration due to lack of sleep, prolonged driving, or irregular work schedules. It can affect any driver, but police officers are especially vulnerable due to the nature of their work, which often involves long shifts, night shifts, high-stress situations, and multitasking. Fatigue can lead to decreased reaction time, impaired decision making, reduced situational awareness, and increased risk of accidents. This is a significant factor in officer involved crashes in the United States[2]. Further fatigue has been found to contribute to officer involved shootings[3], poor judgement in crime scene processing and emotional management struggles including building rapport with the public[4][5]. A study indicates 46% of officers have nodded off while driving[6]. Furthermore, driver fatigue can also affect officer wellness, as it can increase the risk of physical and mental health problems, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

We appreciate and respect the hard work and sacrifice of police officers, and we want to support them in their safety and wellness. That is why we need innovative solutions that can monitor, detect, and prevent driver fatigue, as well as provide feedback and intervention to improve driving behavior and performance. One such solution is SOLO AI, a cutting-edge technology that uses artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision to analyze driver behavior and provide real-time alerts and coaching. This is a smart device that can be installed in any vehicle, and that uses a camera and a speaker to track the driver's eyes, head, and facial expressions, and to detect signs of fatigue, distraction, or impairment. It can also measure the driver's heart rate, blood pressure, and stress level, and provide personalized feedback and recommendations to improve the driver's health and wellness. It can also record and analyze driving data, such as speed, braking, acceleration, and lane changes, and provide insights and suggestions to improve driving skills and reduce the risk of accidents. It is designed to enhance the driver's awareness, alertness, and performance, and to create a safer and healthier driving environment.

This white paper will provide an overview of AI technology, and how they can be used to analyze police officer driver fatigue, prevent accidents, and improve officer wellness. It will discuss comparing driving behavior and accident rates across different shift lengths, as well as data on officer wellness and behavior before and after certain call types. It will discuss how this data could be used to reduce officer-involved minor traffic accidents and traffic accidents in general, and to inform policy and practice changes that could enhance officer safety and wellness.

AI and Driver Fatigue

SOLO AI is a technology that uses AI and computer vision to analyze the driver's behavior, attention, and alertness in real time[7]. It is based on the latest research and development in the fields of driver fatigue detection, driver behavior analysis, and driver coaching[8]. This consists of a camera that is mounted on the windshield or the dashboard of the vehicle, and a software that processes the images and videos captured by the camera[9]. It can detect various indicators of driver fatigue, such as eye closure, head pose, yawning, blinking, and facial expressions[10]. This technology can also measure the driver's cognitive load, distraction, and engagement, by analyzing the driver's gaze direction, pupil dilation, and eye movements[11]. Based on the analysis of the driver's behavior, attention, and alertness, the AI can provide timely and personalized feedback, alerts, and interventions to the driver, as well as to the dispatchers and supervisors, to help them manage driver fatigue and improve officer wellness and safety.

·         The camera is a high-resolution device that can capture the driver's eyes, head, and facial expressions, and detect signs of fatigue, distraction, or impairment[12]. The camera can also measure the driver's heart rate, blood pressure, and stress level, using a technique called photoplethysmography (PPG), which analyzes the changes in blood volume in the skin[13]. The camera can also record the driver's voice and the ambient noise, and use natural language processing (NLP) to analyze the driver's mood and emotion[14].

·         The speaker is a device that can communicate with the driver and provide real-time alerts and coaching[15]. The speaker can use voice, sound, or vibration to warn the driver of potential hazards, and suggestions. The speaker can also use voice, sound, or music to stimulate the driver's alertness, such as by playing upbeat songs, asking questions, or giving compliments. Lastly when officers show signs of fatigue, distraction, or inattention, and suggest them to take a break, adjust their posture, or perform a cognitive task to increase their alertness[16].

·          The speaker uses voice or sound to provide personalized feedback and recommendations to improve the driver's health and wellness, such as by suggesting a break, a nap, or a snack. Additionally, the speaker can also send feedback to the driver's supervisors and dispatchers, who can monitor the driver's fatigue level and driving behavior, and provide support and assistance, such as by holding or reassigning a call for service, or by affording the driver a break[17].

·         The cloud-based platform is a system that can store and analyze the data collected by the camera and the speaker, and provide insights and suggestions to improve driving behavior and performance. The platform can use machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) to identify patterns and trends in the data, and to generate reports and dashboards that can show the driver's fatigue level, driving skills, and wellness indicators[18]. The platform can also use ML and DL to create customized coaching programs that can help the driver improve their driving habits and reduce the risk of accidents[19]. The platform can also use ML and DL to compare the driver's data with other drivers' data, and to provide benchmarks and rankings that can motivate the driver to improve their driving performance and wellness. Furthermore, the platform can also share the data, insights and reports with the driver's supervisors and dispatchers, who can use the information to make informed decisions and policies that can enhance officer safety and wellness[20].

Driver Behavior Technology

SOLO AI is not the only technology that can be used to monitor and analyze driver behavior and provide feedback and coaching. There are other similar technologies that can offer some of the same features and benefits, such as:

·         Driver State Monitor (DSM), a technology developed by Seeing Machines, that uses a camera and an infrared sensor to track the driver's eyes, head, and facial expressions, and to detect signs of fatigue, distraction, or impairment. DSM can also provide real-time alerts and interventions to prevent accidents and injuries[21].

·         Driver Attention Monitor (DAM), a technology developed by Denso, that uses a camera and a radar sensor to track the driver's eyes, head, and facial expressions, and to detect signs of fatigue, distraction, or impairment. DAM can also provide real-time alerts and interventions to prevent accidents and injuries[22].

·         DriverFocus, a technology developed by Subaru, that uses a camera and a facial recognition software to track the driver's eyes, head, and facial expressions, and to detect signs of fatigue, distraction, or impairment. DriverFocus can also provide real-time alerts and interventions to prevent accidents and injuries[23].

·         Driver Behavior Analysis (DBA), a technology developed by Affectiva, that uses a camera and a speaker to track the driver's eyes, head, facial expressions, and voice, and to detect signs of fatigue, distraction, impairment, mood, and emotion. DBA can also provide real-time feedback and coaching to improve driving behavior and performance[24].

·         Driver Coaching System (DCS), a technology developed by GreenRoad, that uses a camera and a speaker to track the driver's eyes, head, facial expressions, and voice, and to measure the driver's speed, braking, acceleration, and lane changes. DCS can also provide real-time feedback and coaching to improve driving behavior and performance[25].

Driving Behavior and Accident Rates Across Different Shift Lengths

One of the factors that can affect driver fatigue and performance among police officers is the length of their shifts. Police officers often work long and irregular shifts, which can disrupt their circadian rhythms, sleep patterns, and alertness levels. The optimal shift length for police officers is a matter of debate, as different studies have shown different results and implications. Some studies have suggested that shorter shifts (8 hours or less) are better for reducing fatigue and improving performance, while other studies have suggested that longer shifts (10 hours or more) are better for increasing productivity and satisfaction. A comprehensive review of the literature on shift length and police performance by the Policing Institute found that there is no conclusive evidence that one shift length is superior to another, and that the effects of shift length depend on various factors, such as the type and intensity of work, the workload and demand, the individual and organizational characteristics, and the environmental and social conditions[26]. The review also found that there is a need for more research and evaluation on the impact of shift length on police performance and outcomes, especially on driver fatigue and traffic accidents.

We understand and respect the preferences and needs of police officers regarding their shift length, and we want to help them make informed decisions based on reliable data. That is why this data is essential in comparing shifts, shift length (8 hours or less, 10 hours, and 12 hours or more), time of day, hours worked and more while we measure:

·         Fatigue level: a measure of the driver's alertness and concentration, based on the frequency and duration of eye closure, yawning, blinking, head nodding, and facial expressions.

·         Distraction level: a measure of the driver's attention and focus, based on the frequency and duration of eye gaze, head movement, facial expressions, and voice activity.

·         Impairment level: a measure of the driver's physical and mental state, based on the frequency and duration of eye redness, pupil dilation, facial expressions, and voice tone.

·         Call type: a correlation with call type response to the associated measured behaviors.

Using the data from the Driver AI system, supervisors and trainers can monitor the performance and behavior of officers on the road and provide feedback and guidance accordingly. For example, they can identify patterns of distraction or impairment among officers and offer suggestions to improve their focus and alertness. They can also use the call type correlation to tailor the training and mentorship programs to the specific needs and challenges of different types of calls. By doing so, they can help reduce officer involved accidents and enhance the overall wellness and safety of the officers.

Policy Recommendations

- Based on the call type correlation, the police department can implement policies that address the specific stressors and demands of different calls. For instance, they can mandate more frequent rest breaks, meditation sessions, or healthy snacks for officers who handle high-intensity or emotionally draining calls. They can also provide more specialized driving training or simulation exercises for officers who face challenging road conditions or scenarios[27][28][29].

- The Driver AI system can help the police department make evidence-based policy decisions that enhance officer wellness and safety. By analyzing the call type correlation, they can determine the optimal duration and frequency of rest breaks, meditation practices, or nutritious snacks for officers who deal with different types of calls. They can also design driving training programs or simulations that match the level of difficulty and complexity of the road situations that officers encounter[30][31][32].

- The call type correlation can inform policy recommendations that improve officer performance and well-being. The police department can use the Driver AI data to adjust the rest break schedule, meditation guidelines, or snack options for officers according to the nature and intensity of their calls. They can also offer driving training courses or simulations that prepare officers for the various road challenges and hazards that they may face[33][34][35].

Benefits of Driver AI

These technologies can provide various benefits for officer wellness, efficiency, and safety, such as:

·         Reducing the risk of driver fatigue, distraction, and inattention, which are major causes of driving errors, crashes, and injuries.

·         Enhancing the driver's alertness, awareness, and performance, which are essential for effective and safe driving.

·         Improving the driver's well-being, morale, and satisfaction, by providing them with support, feedback, and recognition.

·         Optimizing the driver's workload, schedule, and route, by providing them with data and insights on their fatigue level, attention, and performance, as well as the driving conditions.

·         Increasing the driver's accountability, responsibility, and professionalism, by providing them with reports and dashboards on their driving skills, habits, and safety.

·         Strengthening the communication, collaboration, and coordination between the officer, the dispatchers, and the supervisors, by providing them with alerts, recommendations, and interventions.

Challenges and Recommendations

While these technologies can provide many benefits for officer wellness, efficiency, and safety, they also pose some challenges and limitations, such as:

·         The accuracy, reliability, and validity of the AI and computer vision algorithms, which may vary depending on the quality of the camera, the lighting conditions, the driver's facial features, and the driver's consent and cooperation.

·         The privacy, security, and ethics of the data collection, storage, and sharing, which may raise concerns among the driver, the dispatchers, the supervisors, and the public, especially regarding the potential misuse, abuse, or leakage of the data.

·         The usability, acceptability, and trustworthiness of the feedback, alerts, and interventions, which may depend on the design, timing, frequency, and modality of the feedback, alerts, and interventions, as well as the driver's preferences, expectations, and attitudes.

Therefore, to ensure the successful implementation and adoption of these technologies, some recommendations are:

·         Conduct rigorous testing and evaluation of the AI and computer vision algorithms, to ensure their accuracy, reliability, and validity, and to address any potential biases, errors, or failures.

·         Establish clear and transparent policies and procedures for the data collection, storage, and sharing, to ensure the privacy, security, and ethics of the data, and to obtain the consent and cooperation of the driver, the dispatchers, the supervisors, and the public.

·         Involve the officer, the dispatchers, the supervisors, and the stakeholders in the design, development, and deployment of the feedback, alerts, and interventions, to ensure their usability, acceptability, and trustworthiness, and to address any potential resistance, skepticism, or distrust.

Conclusion

AI technologies are innovative solutions that can help monitor, detect, and prevent driver fatigue among police officers, as well as enhance their wellness, efficiency, and safety. AI can provide timely and personalized feedback, alerts, and interventions to the driver, as well as to the dispatchers and supervisors, to help them manage driver fatigue and improve officer wellness and safety. AI can also provide data and insights on the driver's fatigue level, attention, and performance, as well as the driving conditions and incidents, to help them evaluate and improve the officer's driving skills, habits, and safety. However, SOLO AI and like technologies also pose some challenges and limitations, such as the accuracy, reliability, and validity of the AI and computer vision algorithms, the privacy, security, and ethics of the data collection, storage, and sharing, and the usability, acceptability, and trustworthiness of the feedback, alerts, and interventions. Therefore, to ensure the successful implementation and adoption of AI technologies, some recommendations are to conduct rigorous testing and evaluation of the AI and computer vision algorithms, to establish clear and transparent policies and procedures for the data collection, storage, and sharing, and to involve the driver, the dispatchers, the supervisors, and the stakeholders in the design, development, and deployment of the feedback, alerts, and interventions.

---

[1] National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (2023) 2023 END-OF-YEAR PRELIMINARY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FATALITIES REPORT. Retrieved from https://nleomf.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2023-EOY-Fatality-Report-FINAL.pdf

[2] CDC (2024) Preventing Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) Motor Vehicle Crashes. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/wp-solutions/2024-105/pdfs/2024-105.pdf

[3] David Blake and Edward Cumella, “Officer Fatigue and Officer-Involved Shootings—A Deadly Combination for Error,” Research in Brief, The Police Chief 81 (October 2014): 14–17.

[4] Krizan, Z., et al. (2023). The impact of alertness vs. fatigue on interrogators in an actigraphic study of field investigations. Scientific Reports. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32975-w.

[5] National Library of Medicine (2019) Sleep Quality among Police Officers: Implications and Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427768/

[6] Frankel, N. (2021) Fatigue in Law Enforcement. Retrieved from https://www.benchmarkanalytics.com/blog/fatigue-in-law-enforcement/

[7] Li, X., Li, X., Shen, Z. et al. Driver fatigue detection based on improved YOLOv7. J Real-Time Image Proc 21, 75 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11554-024-01455-3

[8] Arrowes. (n.d.). FEY-YOLOv7: A Driver Fatigue Detection Algorithm Based on Dynamic Tracking of Small Facial Targets Using YOLOv7. Retrieved from https://github.com/Arrowes/FEY-YOLOv7

[9] El-Nabi, S.A., El-Shafai, W., El-Rabaie, ES.M. et al. Machine learning and deep learning techniques for driver fatigue and drowsiness detection: a review. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 9441–9477 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15054-0

[10] Das S, Pratihar S, Pradhan B, Jhaveri RH, Benedetto F. IoT-Assisted Automatic Driver Drowsiness Detection through Facial Movement Analysis Using Deep Learning and a U-Net-Based Architecture. Information. 2024; 15(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010030

[11] Cheng, W., Wang, X. & Mao, B. A multi-feature fusion algorithm for driver fatigue detection based on a lightweight convolutional neural network. Vis Comput 40, 2419–2441 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-023-02927-6

[12] Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Niu, X. et al. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) based learning fatigue detection. Appl Intell 53, 27951–27965 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04926-5

[13] Kong L, Xie K, Niu K, He J, Zhang W. Remote Photoplethysmography and Motion Tracking Convolutional Neural Network with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory: Non-Invasive Fatigue Detection Method Based on Multi-Modal Fusion. Sensors. 2024; 24(2):455. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24020455

[14] Tsai, Y. C., Lai, P. W., Huang, P. W., Lin, T. M., & Wu, B. F. (2020). Vision-Based Instant Measurement System for Driver Fatigue Monitoring. IEEE Access, 8, 67342-67353. Article 9058685. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986234

[15] Bi, J., Qin, X., Hu, D., & Xu, C. (2023). Fatigue Driving Detection Method Based on IPPG Technology. Promet - Traffic&Transportation, 35(4), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v35i4.134

[16] BI, J. et al. (2023) Fatigue driving detection method based on IPPG technology. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/108b/8c59a916a900022c2d7d58ba8794b179d41e.pdf

[17] Taabi (2024) Driver Behaviour Monitoring. Retrieved from https://taabi.ai/solutions/driver-behaviour-monitoring-system

[18] Abbas Q, Alsheddy A. Driver Fatigue Detection Systems Using Multi-Sensors, Smartphone, and Cloud-Based Computing Platforms: A Comparative Analysis. Sensors. 2021; 21(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010056

[19] Europe PMC (2020) Driver Fatigue Detection Systems Using Multi-Sensors, Smartphone, and Cloud-Based Computing Platforms: A Comparative Analysis. Retrieved from https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33374270

[20] Nandwani, P., Verma, R. A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11, 81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6

[21] Seeing Machines. (n.d.). Driver State Monitor (DSM). Retrieved from https://seeingmachines.com/

[22] DENSO. (n.d.). Driver Attention Monitor (DAM). Retrieved from https://www.denso.com/global/en/business/products-and-services/mobility/pick-up/dsm/

[23] Subaru (2021) How to Use Your Subaru Vehicle’s DriverFocus® Distraction Mitigation System (Forester). Retrieved from youtube.com/watch?v=TdODIATDBVE

[24] Affectiva. (n.d.). Driver Behavior Analysis (DBA). Retrieved from https://blog.affectiva.com/how-biometric-data-can-make-us-better-drivers

[25] GreenRoad. (n.d.). Driver Coaching System (DCS). Retrieved from https://greenroad.com/ 

[26] Amendola, K. L., Slipka, M. G., Hamilton, E. E., & Soelberg, M. (2011). Trends in Shift Length: Results of a Random National Survey of Police Agencies. Police Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.policinginstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Amendola-2011-Trends-in-Shift-Length.pdf

[27] Neusteter, S. R., Mapolski, M., Khogali, M., & O’Toole, M. (2019). The 911 Call Processing System: A Review of the Literature as it Relates to Policing. Vera Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/911-call-processing-system-review-of-policing-literature.pdf

[28] COPS (2003) Call Management and Community Policing. Retrieved from https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/RIC/Publications/cops-w0022-pub.pdf

[29] Jenkins, M., PhD, MBA, & Shields, C., MSPM, PMP, Lieutenant (Ret.). (2024). Taking a Principled Approach to AI in Policing. Police Chief Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/principled-approach-ai/

[30] Neusteter, S. R., Mapolski, M., Khogali, M., & O’Toole, M. (2019). The 911 Call Processing System: A Review of the Literature as it Relates to Policing. Vera Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/911-call-processing-system-review-of-policing-literature.pdf

[31] COPS (2003) Call Management and Community Policing. Retrieved from https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/RIC/Publications/cops-w0022-pub.pdf

[32] Jenkins, M., PhD, MBA, & Shields, C., MSPM, PMP, Lieutenant (Ret.). (2024). Taking a Principled Approach to AI in Policing. Police Chief Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/principled-approach-ai/

[33] Neusteter, S. R., Mapolski, M., Khogali, M., & O’Toole, M. (2019). The 911 Call Processing System: A Review of the Literature as it Relates to Policing. Vera Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/911-call-processing-system-review-of-policing-literature.pdf

[34] COPS (2003) Call Management and Community Policing. Retrieved from https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/RIC/Publications/cops-w0022-pub.pdf

[35] Jenkins, M., PhD, MBA, & Shields, C., MSPM, PMP, Lieutenant (Ret.). (2024). Taking a Principled Approach to AI in Policing. Police Chief Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/principled-approach-ai/