AI for Police to Police Communication: Closing the Gap and Building Trust

Feb 08, 2024

Executive Summary

Police communication is a vital aspect of law enforcement and public safety. However, there are many challenges and barriers that prevent effective and timely communication among police agencies, especially when dealing with criminal enterprises that operate across state or jurisdictional boundaries. These enterprises exploit the gaps in police communication to evade detection, prosecution, and accountability, while victimizing people all over the US. Some examples of these crimes are internet fraud, identity theft, merchandise fraud, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and money laundering.

This white paper proposes a solution that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance police communication and collaboration, and to address the problem of cross-border criminal enterprises. AI can help police agencies to share and analyze data from various sources, such as records management systems (RMS), regional information sharing systems (RISS), and other platforms, and to identify patterns, trends, and links among multiple victims, suspects, and locations. AI can also help police agencies to coordinate and communicate with each other, and to streamline the processes of investigation, prosecution, and extradition. By using AI to close the communication gap, police agencies can improve their efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability, and reduce the harm and losses caused by criminal enterprises.

Moreover, this white paper argues that using AI to fix the police communication gap can also have positive impacts on the trust and collaboration between the police and the communities they serve. By demonstrating that the police are taking proactive and coordinated actions to address the crimes that affect people's lives, the police can enhance their legitimacy, credibility, and transparency, and foster a sense of justice and satisfaction among the public. By using AI to facilitate communication and collaboration, the police can also engage more with the community, solicit feedback, and provide information and assistance, and thus build a stronger relationship and partnership with the people they serve.

Introduction

Police communication is a crucial component of law enforcement and public safety. It enables police agencies to exchange information, coordinate actions, and collaborate with each other, as well as with other stakeholders, such as prosecutors, courts, and the public. Effective police communication can improve the quality and speed of investigations, prosecutions, and interventions, and can enhance the accountability and transparency of police operations. Furthermore, effective police communication can foster trust and collaboration between the police and the communities they serve, and can contribute to the prevention and reduction of crime and violence[1].

However, police communication is also fraught with many challenges and barriers, especially in the context of the US, where there are thousands of police agencies at the federal, state, and local levels, each with its own jurisdiction, authority, and culture. Some of the common obstacles that hinder police communication are:

· Lack of interoperability and compatibility among different systems and platforms that police agencies use to collect, store, and share data, such as RMS, RISS, and others[2].

· Lack of standardization and consistency in the definitions, classifications, and reporting of crimes and incidents, which can lead to discrepancies, inaccuracies, and incompleteness in the data[3].

· Lack of resources and incentives for police agencies to share and access data, especially across state or jurisdictional boundaries, which can limit the scope and depth of the information available[4].

· Lack of trust and cooperation among police agencies, which can result from competition, rivalry, or distrust, and can affect the willingness and quality of the information sharing and collaboration[5].

· Lack of legal and regulatory frameworks and mechanisms to facilitate and regulate the cross-border exchange and use of data, especially in terms of privacy, security, and accountability[6].

These challenges and barriers create a communication gap among police agencies, which can have serious and negative consequences for law enforcement and public safety. One of the most pressing problems that arises from the communication gap is the difficulty of dealing with criminal enterprises that operate across state or jurisdictional boundaries. These enterprises take advantage of the communication gap to evade detection, prosecution, and accountability, while victimizing people all over the US. Some examples of these crimes are internet fraud, identity theft, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and money laundering[7].

These crimes pose significant challenges for police communication and collaboration, because they involve multiple victims, suspects, and locations, and require coordination and cooperation among different agencies and jurisdictions. However, due to the communication gap, police agencies often face difficulties in identifying, tracking, and linking the cases that are related to the same criminal enterprise, and in sharing and analyzing the relevant data and evidence. Moreover, police agencies often face obstacles in communicating and collaborating with each other, and in streamlining the processes of investigation, prosecution, and extradition. As a result, these crimes often go unpunished, and the criminal enterprises continue to operate and profit, while the victims suffer losses and damages, and lose trust and confidence in the police and the justice system[8].

This white paper proposes a solution that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance police communication and collaboration, and to address the problem of cross-border criminal enterprises. AI is a broad term that refers to the use of computer systems and algorithms to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as reasoning, learning, decision making, and problem solving[9]. AI can help police agencies to share and analyze data from various sources, such as RMS, RISS, and other platforms, and to identify patterns, trends, and links among multiple victims, suspects, and locations. AI can also help police agencies to coordinate and communicate with each other, and to streamline the processes of investigation, prosecution, and extradition. By using AI to close the communication gap, police agencies can improve their efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability, and reduce the harm and losses caused by criminal enterprises.

AI for Police Communication: How It Works

The proposed solution of using AI for police communication consists of three main components: data sharing, data analysis, and data communication. Each component is explained in detail below.

Data Sharing

Data sharing is the process of making data available and accessible to different police agencies, as well as to other stakeholders, such as prosecutors, courts, and the public. Data sharing is essential for police communication and collaboration, because it provides the basis for identifying, investigating, and prosecuting cross-border criminal enterprises[10]. However, data sharing is also challenging and complex, because it involves various types of data, such as crime reports, incident records, arrest records, evidence, intelligence, and others, and various sources of data, such as RMS, RISS, and others, each with its own format, structure, and quality[11].

AI can help to overcome the challenges and complexities of data sharing, by providing tools and techniques to integrate, harmonize, and standardize the data from different sources and platforms, and to ensure the quality, accuracy, and completeness of the data[12]. AI can also help to enhance the security, privacy, and accountability of the data sharing, by providing tools and techniques to encrypt, anonymize, and audit the data, and to ensure the compliance with the relevant laws and regulations[13]. AI can also help to improve the efficiency and usability of the data sharing, by providing tools and techniques to index, search, and retrieve the data, and to provide user-friendly interfaces and visualizations[14].

Data Analysis

Data analysis is the process of extracting insights and knowledge from the data, and using them to support decision making and problem solving. Data analysis is crucial for police communication and collaboration, because it enables police agencies to identify, track, and link the cases that are related to the same criminal enterprise, and to discover the patterns, trends, and connections among the victims, suspects, and locations[15]. However, data analysis is also difficult and time-consuming, because it involves large and complex datasets, and requires advanced skills and expertise[16].

AI can help to facilitate and expedite the data analysis, by providing tools and techniques to perform various tasks, such as data mining, machine learning, natural language processing, and others, that can help police agencies to:

· Identify and classify the types and categories of the crimes and incidents, and to detect the anomalies and outliers[17].

· Identify and verify the identities and profiles of the victims and suspects, and to match them with the existing records and databases[18].

· Identify and locate the places and regions where the crimes and incidents occurred, and to map them with the geographic and demographic information[19].

· Identify and measure the relationships and associations among the victims, suspects, and locations, and to construct the networks and graphs that represent them[20].

· Identify and predict the patterns and trends of the crimes and incidents, and to forecast the future scenarios and outcomes[21].

AI can also help to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the data analysis, by providing tools and techniques to validate, verify, and explain the results and findings, and to assess the confidence and uncertainty of the predictions and forecasts[22].

Data Communication

Data communication is the process of exchanging and disseminating the data and the results of the data analysis among different police agencies, as well as with other stakeholders, such as prosecutors, courts, and the public[23]. Data communication is important for police communication and collaboration, because it enables police agencies to coordinate and cooperate with each other, and to streamline the processes of investigation, prosecution, and extradition[24]. Data communication is also important for building trust and collaboration between the police and the communities they serve, because it enables police agencies to inform and engage with the public, and to provide information and assistance to the victims and witnesses[25].

AI can help to improve and optimize the data communication, by providing tools and techniques to:

· Format and present the data and the results of the data analysis in a clear, concise, and consistent manner, and to tailor them to the needs and preferences of the different audiences and stakeholders[26].

· Transmit and deliver the data and the results of the data analysis in a timely, secure, and efficient manner, and to use the appropriate channels and platforms, such as email, phone, web, social media, and others[27].

· Facilitate and support the interaction and feedback among the different police agencies, and with other stakeholders, such as prosecutors, courts, and the public, and to use the appropriate modes and methods, such as text, voice, video, chat, and others[28].

· Monitor and evaluate the impact and outcomes of the data communication, and to use the appropriate metrics and indicators, such as response rate, satisfaction rate, collaboration rate, and others[29].

AI for Police Communication: Benefits and Implications

The proposed solution of using AI for police communication can have significant benefits and implications for law enforcement and public safety, as well as for the trust and collaboration between the police and the communities they serve. Some of the main benefits and implications are discussed below.

Benefits and Implications for Law Enforcement and Public Safety

By using AI to enhance police communication and collaboration, police agencies can improve their efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability, and reduce the harm and losses caused by cross-border criminal enterprises. Some of the specific benefits and implications are:

· Improved detection and prevention of cross-border crimes, by enabling police agencies to identify, track, and link the cases that are related to the same criminal enterprise, and to discover the patterns, trends, and connections among the victims, suspects, and locations[30].

· Improved investigation and prosecution of cross-border crimes, by enabling police agencies to coordinate and cooperate with each other, and to streamline the processes of investigation, prosecution, and extradition[31].

· Improved accountability and transparency of police operations, by enabling police agencies to share and analyze data from various sources and platforms, and to ensure the quality, accuracy, and completeness of the data, as well as the security, privacy, and accountability of the data sharing[32].

· Reduced harm and losses caused by cross-border crimes, by enabling police agencies to take proactive and coordinated actions to address the crimes that affect people's lives, and to provide information and assistance to the victims and witnesses[33].

Benefits and Implications for Trust and Collaboration between the Police and the Communities They Serve

By using AI to enhance police communication and collaboration, police agencies can also improve the trust and collaboration between the police and the communities they serve. Some of the specific benefits and implications are:

· Enhanced legitimacy, credibility, and transparency of the police, by demonstrating that the police are taking proactive and coordinated actions to address the crimes that affect people's lives, and by providing information and evidence of the results and outcomes of the police operations[34].

· Enhanced sense of justice and satisfaction among the public, by demonstrating that the police are holding the criminal enterprises accountable, and by providing information and assistance to the victims and witnesses[35].

· Enhanced relationship and partnership between the police and the community, by facilitating communication and feedback among the police and the public, and by soliciting and incorporating the input and suggestions of the community members[36].

· Enhanced prevention and reduction of crime and violence, by fostering a sense of trust and collaboration between the police and the community, and by engaging the community in the co-production of public safety[37].

Conclusion

This white paper has proposed a solution that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance police communication and collaboration, and to address the problem of cross-border criminal enterprises. AI can help police agencies to share and analyze data from various sources and platforms, and to identify patterns, trends, and links among multiple victims, suspects, and locations. AI can also help police agencies to coordinate and communicate with each other, and to streamline the processes of investigation, prosecution, and extradition. By using AI to close the communication gap, police agencies can improve their efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability, and reduce the harm and losses caused by criminal enterprises.

Moreover, this white paper has argued that using AI to fix the police communication gap can also have positive impacts on the trust and collaboration between the police and the communities they serve. By demonstrating that the police are taking proactive and coordinated actions to address the crimes that affect people's lives, the police can enhance their legitimacy, credibility, and transparency, and foster a sense of justice and satisfaction among the public. By using AI to facilitate communication and collaboration, the police can also engage more with the community, solicit feedback, and provide information and assistance, and thus build a stronger relationship and partnership with the people they serve.

[1] Folami, O. M., & Naylor, R. J. (2017). Police and cross-border crime in an era of globalisation: The case of the Benin–Nigeria border. Security Journal, 30(3), 859-879. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/sj.2015.17

[2] Legrand, T., & Leuprecht, C. (2021). Securing cross-border collaboration: transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit international political economy. Policy and Society, 40(4), 565-586. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety/article/40/4/565/6509337?login=false

[3] Folami, O. M., & Naylor, R. J. (2017). Police and cross-border crime in an era of globalisation: The case of the Benin–Nigeria border. Security Journal, 30(3), 859-879. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/sj.2015.17

[4] Legrand, T., & Leuprecht, C. (2021). Securing cross-border collaboration: transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit international political economy. Policy and Society, 40(4), 565-586. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety/article/40/4/565/6509337?login=false

[5] Folami, O. M., & Naylor, R. J. (2017). Police and cross-border crime in an era of globalisation: The case of the Benin–Nigeria border. Security Journal, 30(3), 859-879. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/sj.2015.17

[6] Legrand, T., & Leuprecht, C. (2021). Securing cross-border collaboration: transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit international political economy. Policy and Society, 40(4), 565-586. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety/article/40/4/565/6509337?login=false

[7] Shelley, L. I. (2018). Dark commerce: How a new illicit economy is threatening our future. Princeton University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv346n56

[8] Folami, O. M., & Naylor, R. J. (2017). Police and cross-border crime in an era of globalisation: The case of the Benin–Nigeria border. Security Journal, 30(3), 859-879. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/sj.2015.17

[9][9] Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson.

[10] Legrand, T., & Leuprecht, C. (2021). Securing cross-border collaboration: transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit international political economy. Policy and Society, 40(4), 565-586. Retrieved from https://econpapers.repec.org/article/ouppolsoc/v_3a40_3ay_3a2021_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a565-586..htm

[11] Dees, T. (2023). The evolution of data-sharing in law enforcement. Police1. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/data-sharing-law-enforcement/the-evolution-of-data-sharing-in-law-enforcement

[12] RAND Corporation. (2015). Improving information-sharing across law enforcement. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR645.html

[13] Domestic Preparedness. (2023). Data sharing – A necessary public safety tool. Retrieved from https://domesticpreparedness.com/science-technology/data-sharing-a-necessary-public-safety-tool

[14] Police1. (2023). Strengthening public safety: How cross-agency data sharing helps identify regional crime trends. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/data-sharing-law-enforcement/strengthening-public-safety-how-cross-agency-data-sharing-helps-identify-regional-crime-trends

[15] Dees, T. (2023). The evolution of data-sharing in law enforcement. Police1. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/data-sharing-law-enforcement/the-evolution-of-data-sharing-in-law-enforcement

[16] RAND Corporation. (2015). Improving information-sharing across law enforcement. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR600/RR645/RAND_RR645.pdf

[17] Revolutionizing law enforcement data analytics with advanced AI. (2023). Police1. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/police-products/investigation/investigative-software/articles/revolutionizing-law-enforcement-data-analytics-with-advanced-ai-rRpAEaXQe7Cp7iS3/

[18] Santos, A., & Jenkins, I. (2020) Investigative Analytics. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/law-enforcement-investigative-analytics.html

[19] Santos, A., & Jenkins, I. (2020) Investigative Analytics. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/law-enforcement-investigative-analytics.html

[20] Santos, A., & Jenkins, I. (2020) Investigative Analytics. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/law-enforcement-investigative-analytics.html

[21] Santos, A., & Jenkins, I. (2020) Investigative Analytics. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/law-enforcement-investigative-analytics.html

[22] Santos, A., & Jenkins, I. (2020) Investigative Analytics. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/law-enforcement-investigative-analytics.html

[23] Drogan, V. (2023, July 19). How AI is changing the way we communicate. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/07/19/how-ai-is-changing-the-way-we-communicate/?sh=8c8391336b3d

[24] Greenhouse, S. (2020, July 30). The coronavirus pandemic has intensified systemic economic racism against black Americans. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-pandemic-has-intensified-systemic-economic-racism-against-black-americans

[25] Importance of Police-Community Relationships and Resources for Further Reading. (2015). Community Relations Services Toolkit for Policing. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/file/1437336/download

[26] Davenport, T. H., & Redman, T. C. (2022, December 20). How AI is improving data management. MIT Sloan Management Review. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-ai-is-improving-data-management/

[27] Mobile data computers for law enforcement. (2023, February 9). Digi International. Retrieved from https://www.digi.com/blog/post/mobile-data-computers-for-law-enforcement

[28] Artificial intelligence and data science for communications. (n.d.). IEEE Communications Society. Retrieved from https://www.comsoc.org/publications/magazines/ieee-communications-magazine/cfp/artificial-intelligence-and-data-science

[29] Drogan, V. (2023, July 19). How AI is changing the way we communicate. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/07/19/how-ai-is-changing-the-way-we-communicate/?sh=8c8391336b3d

[30] Wallace, C. (2023, September 21). Upgrade law enforcement response with AI solutions from Microsoft. Microsoft Industry Blogs. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/industry/blog/government/2023/09/21/upgrade-law-enforcement-response-with-ai-solutions-from-microsoft/

[31] Advancing policing through AI: Insights from the global law enforcement community. (2023, October 17). Police1. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/iacp/articles/advancing-policing-through-ai-insights-from-the-global-law-enforcement-community-3SzYuRViccy8vwQ3/

[32] Police adviser publishes principles for use of AI. (2020, November 12). UKAuthority. Retrieved from https://www.ukauthority.com/articles/police-adviser-publishes-principles-for-use-of-ai/

[33] Artificial Intelligence and Community-Police Relations. (2019, June 12). Police Chief Magazine. Retrieved from Retrieved from https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/ai-community-police-relations/

[34] Miller, K. (2023, October 16). Leveraging AI capabilities to build community trust with law enforcement agencies. Microsoft On the Issues. Retrieved from https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2023/10/16/polis-solutions-ai-analysis-bodycam-police-truststat/

[35] Ethical considerations for using ChatGPT for law enforcement. (2023, May 19). Police1. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/artificial-intelligence/articles/ethical-considerations-for-using-chatgpt-for-law-enforcement-WPJCKVBwQxu11KBt/

[36] Artificial intelligence and policing: It’s a matter of trust. (2022, March 29). Policing Insight. Retrieved from https://policinginsight.com/feature/opinion/artificial-intelligence-and-policing-its-a-matter-of-trust/

[37] Artificial intelligence and community-police relations. (2019, June 12). Police Chief Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/ai-community-police-relations/

Philip’s Substack